Commercial LED Area Lights Buying Guide: Distribution Types, Pole Spacing, Glare Control
Commercial LED area lights are specified for parking lots, campuses, and roadway-adjacent sites where distribution geometry, mounting height, and pole placement determine uniformity, glare risk, and property-line spill. Performance depends on optic type, orientation, spacing-to-height, and control strategy, not wattage alone.
For configurations aligned with the checks below, browse commercial LED area lights.
Related categories and common application use
Area lighting context and specification references
Type III vs Type V Optics for Parking Lot and Area Lighting Layouts Reading Photometric Reports for Parking Lot and Area Light Design Choosing the Right Dusk-to-Dawn Controls for Area Lights
Area light specification workflow: distribution choice, spacing validation, glare control, and commissioning
Use this workflow to select the distribution by pole location, validate spacing and uniformity with photometrics, preflight glare and property-line spill, and document final orientation and control behavior for turnover. The sections below mirror decision points used on parking lot and campus site-lighting specifications.
Site lighting specification guidance
Area lighting outcomes depend on mounting height, pole spacing, distribution type, and glare and light-trespass containment. Common failure modes include dark lanes between poles, hot spots under poles, driver-eye glare on approaches, and spill light beyond the property line.
Use the commercial site lighting buying guide to coordinate area lights with canopy, flood, and wall-mounted perimeter zones so distribution, glare control, and controls behavior match across the property.
Distribution patterns and selection rules
Distribution type determines where the intensity is placed relative to the pole. Choose the pattern by pole location and boundary exposure, then confirm orientation on the plan set.
Selection rule: Type III is typically used for perimeter rows where you need forward and lateral throw without wasting light behind the pole line. Type IV is used where stronger forward reach is required at tight edges or roadway-adjacent conditions. Type V is used for centrally located poles that must deliver uniform 360 degree coverage.
When perimeter coverage is shared with wall-mounted luminaires, align cutoff and forward-throw expectations with the wall pack buying guide.
| Distribution | Best pole placement | Best-fit zones | Primary risk | Spec check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type III | Perimeter rows and edge-of-lot poles | Parking edges, perimeter walkways, boundary drive lanes | Backlight spill if orientation is wrong | Confirm pole-side backlight control and fixture orientation on the plan |
| Type IV | Tight edges and roadway-adjacent conditions | Service drives, loading approaches, narrow side yards | Property-line spill from excessive forward throw | Validate forward reach and boundary grid points in photometrics |
| Type V | Central poles in a grid | Central parking rows, open paved areas, plazas | Dark edges if pole spacing is too wide | Validate minimum levels at the perimeter of the pole grid |
Pole spacing and mounting height checks
Spacing and mounting height determine uniformity more than raw output. Higher mounting can increase coverage, but glare control and distribution selection become more sensitive. Photometrics are the control point when boundary constraints, non-standard pole layouts, or uniformity requirements exist.
If the project includes covered drive lanes or pump islands, coordinate mounting heights and adjacent brightness transitions with the canopy lighting buyer's guide.
| Symptom | Typical cause | Specification correction | Validation trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dark lanes between poles | Spacing too wide for the chosen distribution and height | Adjust pole spacing, change distribution, or re-balance zones by pole location | Run photometrics with actual pole coordinates and mounting heights |
| Hot spots under poles | Output oversized for height or spacing too tight | Reduce output selection or choose optics that lower high-angle brightness | Confirm max-to-min ratios and check driver-eye viewpoints |
| Uneven perimeter brightness | Mixed distributions or inconsistent orientation at edges | Standardize distribution by zone and document orientation | Verify fixture orientation notes in submittals and as-builts |
| Excess light at the property line | Perimeter optics too wide or insufficient backlight control | Use edge-appropriate distributions and validate setbacks | Check property-line calculation points in the photometric report |
Glare and light-trespass preflight
Area lights create complaints when peak intensity is visible from approach lanes or when spill reaches neighboring properties. Preflight glare and trespass using approach viewpoints and property-line grid points before locking optics and pole counts.
Where the perimeter includes façade entries or loading doors, confirm whether wall-mounted luminaires are required to complete vertical illumination or eliminate near-wall shadows. If so, align cutoff and forward-throw assumptions with the wall lights buying guide.
| Risk | Where it appears | Specification fix | Verification step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Driver-eye glare | Entrances, drive aisles, approach lanes | Use better controlled optics, avoid over-output at the pole line, confirm correct orientation | Review high-angle intensity and approach viewpoints in photometrics |
| Boundary spill | Property edges, adjacent roads, neighboring windows | Use edge-appropriate distributions and backlight containment where required | Check property-line grid points and behind-the-pole spill |
| Non-uniform site brightness | Phased retrofits and mixed pole heights | Standardize pole heights where possible and keep one optic family per zone | Use a zone-based photometric plan and document settings by zone |
Mounting interfaces and orientation
Mounting choice is usually dictated by existing pole infrastructure and aiming requirements. Orientation errors are a common cause of performance misses, especially on Type III and Type IV perimeter poles.
| Mount type | Best use | Spec check | Closeout note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slip fitter (tenon) | Standard parking-lot poles | Confirm tenon size and aiming range | Record final orientation by pole line and zone |
| Direct arm mount | Poles requiring fixed alignment | Confirm pole compatibility and bolt pattern | Confirm orientation is fixed as intended on the plan |
| Yoke or trunnion | Structure mounts and special locations | Confirm structure suitability and aiming limits | Verify aiming does not create glare or boundary spill |
Controls and operating strategy
Most sites require predictable dusk-to-dawn behavior. Where policy allows, scheduling or dim profiles reduce energy use while maintaining a consistent baseline. Controls intent should be documented so the site does not drift after turnover.
For perimeter packages that combine poles, wall packs, and floods, keep one controls narrative by zone. Where façade or perimeter coverage relies on wall-mounted luminaires, coordinate zoning assumptions with the wall pack buying guide and the wall lights buying guide.
| Control approach | Best fit | Behavior | Documentation check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photocell (dusk-to-dawn) | General site and perimeter baseline | On at dusk, off at dawn | Confirm placement avoids false triggers and remains serviceable |
| Schedule or timeclock | Sites with predictable hours | On/off or reduced output by time | Record schedule and any dim levels by zone at closeout |
| Motion-based dimming | Low-traffic areas where reduction is permitted | Baseline output with higher output on activity | Set baseline intentionally and document sensor settings by zone |
| High-end trim or capped profiles | Brightness complaints or ordinance-sensitive sites | Limits maximum output and standardizes behavior | Record final trim levels and pole groups for maintenance consistency |
Commercial Project Support
- Commercial Project Support
- Quote Intake and Project Routing
- Photometrics
- Submittals
- Shipping Reliability and Fulfillment
- Closeout Documentation
- Returns and Restocking
- Warranty Claims
- Frequently Asked Questions
FAQs
How should I choose between Type III, Type IV, and Type V distributions?
Choose by pole location and boundary exposure. Type III is typically used on perimeter rows to push light forward and laterally into the lot. Type IV is used where stronger forward reach is required at tight edges or roadway-adjacent conditions. Type V is used on central poles where uniform 360 degree coverage is needed.
Why do photometric reports matter for LED area lights?
Photometrics validate expected light levels and uniformity for the exact pole locations, mounting heights, and optics. They reduce trial-and-error by identifying dark lanes, hot spots, and property-line spill before hardware is ordered or installed.
What typically causes glare complaints in parking lots?
Glare complaints usually occur when high-angle intensity is visible from approach lanes or when output is oversized for the mounting height. Corrective actions are typically improved optic control, correct fixture orientation, and output reduction or profile limits where available.
How do I reduce light trespass beyond the property line?
Use edge-appropriate distributions on perimeter poles, confirm backlight containment where required, and validate boundary grid points in photometrics. Orientation errors can create backlight spill even with the right optic type, so plan notes and closeout documentation matter.
Do I need photocells or scheduled controls for area lights?
Most sites use photocells for dusk-to-dawn operation. Schedules or dim profiles are used when late-night reduction is allowed and the site needs consistent operating behavior. Document zone intent so future maintenance does not change the lighting profile.