Side-by-side comparison of full-cutoff and semi-cutoff LED wall packs on a commercial building exterior showing reduced skyglow and light pollution compliance while maintaining perimeter security

Full-Cutoff vs. Semi-Cutoff Wall Packs: Meeting Light Pollution Ordinances While Maintaining Perimeter Security

Why Wall Pack Selection Creates Compliance Risk in Industrial Sites

Wall packs are perimeter fixtures. That means they are frequently installed near property lines, adjacent roadways, and neighboring buildings. When glare or spill light becomes an issue, wall packs are often the first fixtures cited in complaints and inspections.

Full-cutoff and semi-cutoff wall packs solve different problems. Full-cutoff designs are used to control uplight and glare. Semi-cutoff designs can improve near-wall vertical illumination but can also increase window trespass and perceived brightness if misapplied.

What Full-Cutoff and Semi-Cutoff Mean in Practice

Cutoff describes how much light is emitted at high angles above horizontal. Practically, cutoff is a glare and trespass control tool.

Wall Pack Type Distribution Behavior Most Common Result
Full-Cutoff Light directed downward with minimal uplight Lower glare, less light trespass
Semi-Cutoff Includes some upward/forward component Brighter façades, higher glare risk

Full-cutoff designs are typically easier to defend during a dark-sky or nuisance-lighting review.

How Cutoff Affects Glare, Trespass, and Security

Security lighting is often misunderstood as “more brightness.” In practice, security requires predictable visibility without creating glare that reduces situational awareness.

Performance Goal Full-Cutoff Impact Semi-Cutoff Impact
Glare control Strong Weaker (depends on lens)
Window trespass risk Lower Higher
Near-wall vertical lighting Moderate Higher
Camera usability Often better (less flare) Can cause bloom and washout

Glare can reduce security effectiveness by lowering contrast and causing camera flare, even when illuminance is high.

Where Full-Cutoff Wall Packs Are the Correct Choice

  • Facilities adjacent to residential properties
  • Sites with strict nuisance-lighting or dark-sky ordinances
  • Perimeters near public roads where glare affects drivers
  • Industrial yards where pole lights provide most area illumination

Full-cutoff wall packs are typically the safest selection when compliance and complaints are primary concerns.

Where Semi-Cutoff Wall Packs Are Justified

Semi-cutoff wall packs can be defensible when the objective is to illuminate the building façade and improve near-wall vertical visibility—provided boundary control is not compromised.

Condition Why Semi-Cutoff May Be Used Required Mitigation
Isolated industrial sites Low neighbor exposure Limit tilt; verify property-line performance
High façade identification needs Doors, signage, perimeter features Use lower output and controlled optics
Short setbacks where poles are not possible Wall packs must do the work Use tighter spacing and lower lumen levels

Semi-cutoff becomes a problem when it is used to “reach” areas better served by poles or properly placed area lights.

Layout Tactics for Compliance Without Dark Zones

  • Use full-cutoff wall packs for the perimeter baseline and add poles for lot coverage where needed
  • Reduce mounting height variance to avoid hot spots and shadow bands
  • Keep fixtures level; avoid upward tilt as a substitute for spacing
  • Use controls (dimming/occupancy) to reduce late-night nuisance light while maintaining security modes
Problem Typical Bad Fix Correct Fix
Dark band between wall packs Increase lumens Tighten spacing or add a pole light
Insufficient yard coverage Tilt wall packs upward Use a Type III area light aimed into the yard
Neighbor complaints Swap to lower wattage only Change cutoff/optics and add shielding

Compliance and security are compatible when the perimeter is treated as a controlled lighting system, not a brightness problem.

Common Wall Pack Mistakes That Trigger Violations

  • Using semi-cutoff wall packs along residential boundaries
  • Tilting fixtures upward to compensate for poor spacing
  • Mounting too high and creating high-angle glare
  • Choosing lumen packages based on “security” assumptions instead of measured need
  • Ignoring how wall packs interact with area lights and site optics

Most ordinance failures are caused by glare and spill direction, not inadequate brightness.

Full-cutoff wall packs are the compliance-first option for perimeter lighting because they control uplight and glare. Semi-cutoff wall packs can be justified for façade visibility, but they must be used with spacing, output, and boundary control in mind to avoid nuisance-lighting violations.

Brandon Waldrop commercial lighting specialist

Brandon Waldrop

As the lead technical specialist for our commercial lighting technical operations, Brandon Waldrop brings over 20 years of industry experience in product specification, outside sales, and industrial lighting applications.

His career began in physical lighting showrooms, where he focused on hands-on product performance and technical support. He later transitioned into commercial outside sales, working directly with architects, electrical contractors, and facility managers to translate complex lighting requirements into energy-efficient, code-compliant solutions.

Today, Brandon applies that industry experience to architect high-performance digital catalogs and technical content systems, helping commercial partners streamline the specification process and deploy lighting solutions with total technical confidence.