Comparison of Type III and Type V parking lot light distributions showing targeted versus wide area illumination

Type III vs. Type V Distribution: How Optic Selection Prevents $10,000 Light Trespass Fines in Parking Lots

Why Optical Distribution Is a Legal Risk, Not Just a Design Choice

In commercial parking lot lighting, fixture wattage and mounting height are only part of the compliance equation. Optical distribution—specifically Type III versus Type V—determines where light actually goes. Improper optic selection is a leading cause of light trespass violations, neighbor complaints, and municipal fines that can exceed $10,000 per site.

As Dark Sky ordinances and zoning enforcement expand, understanding the difference between forward-throw and circular distributions is critical for compliant site lighting design.

Understanding IES Distribution Types

The Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) defines roadway and area light distributions based on how light is projected relative to the fixture location.

Distribution Type Light Pattern Primary Use Case
Type III Asymmetric forward throw Perimeter and edge lighting
Type V Symmetric circular Central pole placement

Using the wrong distribution for pole location is the most common design error.

Type III: Forward-Throw Distribution

Type III optics project light outward and away from the pole, creating an elongated distribution pattern.

Characteristic Type III
Light direction Primarily forward
Backlight control High when properly aimed
Typical mounting Along lot perimeter

Type III optics are ideal when fixtures are mounted near property lines and need to push light inward.

Type V: Circular Distribution

Type V optics distribute light evenly in all directions around the pole.

Characteristic Type V
Light direction 360° symmetric
Backlight control Low near edges
Typical mounting Interior poles

When placed near property lines, Type V optics often push light beyond site boundaries.

How Light Trespass Violations Occur

Light trespass violations are usually documented through horizontal and vertical illuminance measurements at the property line.

Violation Scenario Root Cause
Excess light onto adjacent property Type V used at perimeter
Bright hotspots near fence lines Poor optic alignment
Skyglow complaints Improper cutoff or tilt

Many municipalities impose fines per fixture, not per site.

Selecting the Correct Optic for Parking Lots

Optic selection must align with pole location and zoning boundaries.

Pole Location Recommended Distribution Reason
Perimeter edge Type III Controls backlight and spill
Interior rows Type V Uniform coverage
Near residential boundary Type III with shielding Trespass prevention

Photometric analysis should always include property line calculations—not just average foot-candles.

Correct optic selection—Type III at the perimeter and Type V only where appropriate—prevents light trespass violations, protects property owners from fines, and ensures long-term compliance with evolving outdoor lighting ordinances.

Brandon Waldrop commercial lighting specialist

Brandon Waldrop

As the lead technical specialist for our commercial lighting technical operations, Brandon Waldrop brings over 20 years of industry experience in product specification, outside sales, and industrial lighting applications.

His career began in physical lighting showrooms, where he focused on hands-on product performance and technical support. He later transitioned into commercial outside sales, working directly with architects, electrical contractors, and facility managers to translate complex lighting requirements into energy-efficient, code-compliant solutions.

Today, Brandon applies that industry experience to architect high-performance digital catalogs and technical content systems, helping commercial partners streamline the specification process and deploy lighting solutions with total technical confidence.